Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, with a global score of 82.5 against 79.8. The Google Pixel 2 XL is an notably older cellphone than Motorola One Hyper, but it's somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better pixel amount per display inch.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The Motorola One Hyper features a much better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper has just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.