Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision's 80.7 score. Even though the Google Pixel 2 XL is older than Motorola One Vision, it's design is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Google Pixel 2 XL features just a bit better display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
Google Pixel 2 XL features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Motorola One Vision counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera, a bigger camera aperture for better images in poorly lited situations and a way larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
Motorola One Vision counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola One Vision also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 2 XL has a little better battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 1 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.