Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is slightly better than Motorola One Zoom's 80 general score. The Google Pixel 2 XL is an older cellphone than Motorola One Zoom, but Google was able to build it just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom. They have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Motorola One Zoom has a better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger camera aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments, a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.