Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 2 XL's 82.5 general score. Motorola razr (2020) is a just a little bit heavier phone than Google Pixel 2 XL, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a brighter display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
Motorola razr (2020) has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 26% more battery size. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way bigger sensor, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2 XL, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.