Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black and White | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a global score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW's score of 80.3. Although Google Pixel 2 XL is much older than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, it's design is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW and Google Pixel 2 XL both feature similar processing units, and although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a little more vivid screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, better 60 fps video frame rates and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.