Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than the Nokia XR20, getting a overall score of 82.5 against 80.8. Even though the Google Pixel 2 XL is extremely older than Nokia XR20, it's construction is noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner. Google Pixel 2 XL features a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia XR20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. Nokia XR20 features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Nokia XR20 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Nokia XR20 counts with better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 32% more battery capacity. Nokia XR20 shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.