Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a global score of 82.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 global score. Google Pixel 2 XL is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but Google was able to make it somewhat lighter and a little thinner anyway. Google Pixel 2 XL has a very superior processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy A25 5G features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot worse display pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot more MP back camera.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.