Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is just a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G, having an 82.5 score against 79.4. Google Pixel 2 XL's design is lighter and a little bit thinner than Galaxy A35 5G, although it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's storage capacity for applications and games is just as good as Google Pixel 2 XL's one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A35 5G has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a much better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a much more megapixels camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.