Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 2 XL's global score of 82.5. The Galaxy A52 is a notably newer device than Google Pixel 2 XL, although it is a bit thicker and just a little heavier. Galaxy A52 and Google Pixel 2 XL have extremely similar processing units, and although the Galaxy A52 has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Galaxy A52 features a way better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot bigger sensor and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3520mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.