Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than Galaxy A70, with an 82.5 score against 76.9. Google Pixel 2 XL's design has the same thickness than Galaxy A70, but it is just a bit lighter. The Google Pixel 2 XL has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. Galaxy A70 counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A70 features greater battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3520mAh. Google Pixel 2 XL has a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Google Pixel 2 XL also counts with a bigger sensor shooting higher quality photos.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.