Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than Google Pixel 2 XL, having a overall score of 88.1 against 82.5. The Galaxy F62 construction is extremely newer than Google Pixel 2 XL's, but it's thicker and heavier. Galaxy F62's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Google Pixel 2 XL, because although the Galaxy F62 has less cores (but faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit sharper display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a higher display density. Galaxy F62 features a much better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 99% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.