Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Google Pixel 2 XL's 82.5 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a newer phone than the Google Pixel 2 XL, but it's a little heavier and a little thicker. Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. Google Pixel 2 XL and Galaxy Note 20 have really similar storage capacity to install applications and games, both of them have the same internal storage.
Galaxy Note 20 has better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 22 percent greater battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 captures clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a less mega pixels back facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2 XL, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.