Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is much better than Google Pixel 2 XL's 82.5 overall score. The Galaxy S10 5G is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 2 XL, but both of them are equally thin. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a display that's very similar to the screen in Google Pixel 2 XL, because although the Galaxy S10 5G has a bit lower pixels quantity in each screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a bit higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution. Galaxy S10 5G features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with a worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light captures and a larger sensor capturing better quality photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S10 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S10 5G, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2 XL, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.