Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is much better than Google Pixel 2 XL, with a overall score of 94.8 against 82.5. The Galaxy S20 is a a little lighter phone than the Google Pixel 2 XL, but both are 0.31inches thick. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a little larger screen, a just a bit higher count of pixels per screen inch and a slightly better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S20 counts with a little better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2 XL, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.