Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | -- |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.17 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than Google Pixel 2 XL, with a 90.7 score against 82.5. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is a lot lighter and thinner than the Google Pixel 2 XL. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a better looking screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a little bigger screen.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S25 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a camera in the back with way more MP, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a larger aperture and a much bigger sensor shooting much higher quality pictures.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has more internal memory. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 42 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.