Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a little bit better than Google Pixel 2 XL, having a global score of 83.8 against 82.5. Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better phone than Google Pixel 2 XL, it must be told that it's also a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a camera that's very similar to the camera in Google Pixel 2 XL, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with just a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4 percent larger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2 XL, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.