Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, having a score of 82.5 against 78.7. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 2 XL is incredibly older than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, it's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a higher display pixel density.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a processor that is very similar to Google Pixel 2 XL's processing unit, both of them have 8 cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.