Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and White | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's general score of 81.6. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 2 XL is much older than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, it's body is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit more memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a back camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution and a much larger back camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.