Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having an 82.5 score against 78.2. The Google Pixel 2 XL is an noticeably older cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, but it is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel number in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with more storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3520mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same (Full HD) video quality and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos and a way more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.