Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, having a global score of 82.5 against 82.4. The Google Pixel 2 XL construction is a little lighter and just a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, even though it was released many years before. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a much worse screen density and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 3520mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.