Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, with an 82.5 score against 80.3. Even though the Google Pixel 2 XL is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, it's design is a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3520mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has faster video frame rate, a camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.