Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 score. The Google Pixel 2 XL construction is thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a lot better resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 3520mAh.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.