Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is better than Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 overall score. The iPhone 12 Pro design is much newer and just a little thinner, but also a bit heavier than Google Pixel 3 XL. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a faster processor than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and more RAM memory.
The iPhone 12 Pro features a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, a little lower 1170 x 2532 resolution and a quite smaller display. Apple iPhone 12 Pro has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a camera in the back with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal storage. The Google Pixel 3 XL features better battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 3430mAh battery capacity against 2815mAh.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.