Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is better than Google Pixel 3 XL, having a general score of 93.2 against 80.7. IPhone 13 Pro Max's body is newer and a little thinner than the Google Pixel 3 XL's, although it is much heavier. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a bit worse 1284 x 2778 resolution and a bit worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger display.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a quite better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a higher amount of RAM memory. The iPhone 13 Pro Max takes slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal memory. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 27 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3 XL. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3 XL, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.