Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro is much better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, getting a general score of 95.6 against 80.7. The iPhone 14 Pro design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 3 XL, but it is heavier. IPhone 14 Pro counts with a more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor and a larger amount of RAM.
IPhone 14 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit inferior pixels number per inch of display and a little lower resolution of 1179 x 2556 pixels. Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also has a back facing camera with a much better resolution and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The iPhone 14 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 14 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.