Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, with an 88.1 score against 80.7. The Apple iPhone X is an older device than Google Pixel 3 XL, but it's just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. Apple iPhone X counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone X features a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a quite worse amount of pixels per screen inch, a little smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. Apple iPhone X takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality photos and a back-facing camera with less megapixels resolution, they both have the same camera aperture.
IPhone X has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 3430mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone X, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.