Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is a little bit better than Google Pixel, getting a score of 80.7 against 80.2. Google Pixel 3 XL's construction is newer and just a little bit thinner than the Google Pixel's, but it's also notably heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL features just a little better processing power than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the display, a bigger screen and a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Google Pixel counts with a way bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 3430mAh battery size. The Google Pixel features a camera that is very similar to Google Pixel 3 XL's camera, because although the Google Pixel has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a more MP camera in the back and a bigger camera sensor.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.