Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, getting an 85.4 score against 80.7. The LG K92 is a notably newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 3 XL, although it's a little heavier and a little thicker. Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better CPU than LG K92, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher display pixels density. The LG K92 takes greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the LG K92 also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back facing camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
The LG K92 has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. LG K92 counts with just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3430mAh.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.