Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than LG Q70's 77.9 global score. Even though the Google Pixel 3 XL is older than LG Q70, it's body is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better hardware performance than LG Q70. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a slightly better screen than LG Q70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution. LG Q70 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera.
The LG Q70 has much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG Q70 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Q70 has a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17 percent greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.