Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is a bit better than LG V10's score of 78.6. Google Pixel 3 XL is a a lot newer phone, and it's also a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than LG V10. The LG V10 counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a quite worse screen pixels density, a little worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a little bit smaller screen.
LG V10 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V10 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a quite better performance than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has more cpu cores.
The LG V10 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 16 MP resolution and higher video frame rates.
Google Pixel 3 XL has just a little bit longer battery life than LG V10, because it has a 14% larger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 3 XL is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.