Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 overall score. LG V40 ThinQ is a just a bit thinner and just a little lighter phone than the Google Pixel 3 XL, even though both were released with only a few months difference. The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slightly better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a just a little higher screen pixel density and a little larger display.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG V40 ThinQ takes slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser megapixels, a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 3430mAh battery capacity.
Although LG V40 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a bit more than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3 XL. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.