Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's global score of 80.7. The LG V60 ThinQ body is newer than Google Pixel 3 XL's, although it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL has just a bit better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher screen pixels density.
The LG V60 ThinQ has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ captures clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a way better video quality, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. If you want to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.