Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, having an 87.1 score against 80.7. LG Velvet is a just a little bit lighter phone than the Google Pixel 3 XL, but both have the same thickness. The Google Pixel 3 XL features just a bit better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display.
LG Velvet's processor is very similar to the Google Pixel 3 XL one, and although the LG Velvet has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The LG Velvet shoots better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the LG Velvet also has a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
LG Velvet counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. LG Velvet has improved battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
The LG Velvet costs more than the Google Pixel 3 XL, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.