Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a global score of 91.2, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's score of 80.7. Even though LG Wing is newer than Google Pixel 3 XL, it is much heavier and noticeably thicker. LG Wing has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little sharper display than LG Wing, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px. The LG Wing takes greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the LG Wing also has higher video frame rate, a way larger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
LG Wing has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Wing counts with a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17% larger battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG Wing, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.