Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than Google Pixel 3 XL, with an 89.6 score against 80.7. Motorola edge's design is newer, but thicker and a bit heavier than the Google Pixel 3 XL. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola edge has a CPU that is very similar to Google Pixel 3 XL's processing unit, and although the Motorola edge has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola edge shoots greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola edge also has a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
Motorola edge features a much greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. The Motorola edge has superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 31 percent larger battery size.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3 XL. If you want to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 3 XL, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.