Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than Google Pixel 3 XL, getting a global score of 87.1 against 80.7. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is much newer than Google Pixel 3 XL's, although it's a little thicker and just a little bit heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 3 XL has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much more megapixels camera in the back, a much bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and videos and better video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3430mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.