Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than Moto G Power's 76.1 general score. Although Google Pixel 3 XL is older than Moto G Power, it's body is thinner and a bit lighter. Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution.
Google Pixel 3 XL has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Power. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G Power has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 46% more battery size. The Moto G Power counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Power also counts with a larger aperture and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Google Pixel 3 XL is more expensive than Moto G Power, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.