Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 general score. The Motorola Moto G200 5G is a newer cellphone than Google Pixel 3 XL, but it is just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a higher pixel density.
The Moto G200 5G has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G200 5G takes greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 108 MP resolution.
The Moto G200 5G features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 46 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.