Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is slightly better than the Moto G7 Plus, with a general score of 80.7 against 76.1. Although the Google Pixel 3 XL and the Moto G7 Plus were released with only 4 months difference, the Google Pixel 3 XL design is just a little bit thinner but also just a bit heavier than the Moto G7 Plus.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G7 Plus. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a greater number of pixels per display inch, a quite bigger screen and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Motorola Moto G7 Plus counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
The Moto G7 Plus has much more memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto G7 Plus also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 XL features just a bit longer battery performance than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 3430mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.