Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is a bit better than Moto G8 Power, with a general score of 80.7 against 76. Although the Google Pixel 3 XL is older than the Moto G8 Power, it's body is thinner and a bit lighter. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit sharper display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Motorola Moto G8 Power features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little better hardware performance than Moto G8 Power. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G8 Power shoots a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality images and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a larger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light environments.
Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.