Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 global score. Although Google Pixel 3 XL is a lot newer than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a larger number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little sharper screen than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a little bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a bit larger display. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a way more mega-pixels back camera.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 3 XL and the Moto Z Force Droid Edition both have similar batteries performance, although the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.