Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper, getting a general score of 80.7 against 79.8. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola One Hyper, despite of the fact that it was released around 14 months before. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One Hyper. They have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a better display density. Motorola One Hyper features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola One Hyper features a better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper features a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.