Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision, with an 80.7 score against 80.7. Google Pixel 3 XL's design is just a little heavier but just a bit thinner than the Motorola One Vision, and they were released with only 7 months difference. Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit sharper display than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a same size screen, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better performance than Motorola One Vision. Both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount. Motorola One Vision has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola One Vision's battery life is just as good as the Google Pixel 3 XL one, although the Motorola One Vision also has a 2 percent bigger battery size. Motorola One Vision captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor, a larger aperture for better photos in low light environments and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.