Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Zoom's general score of 80. Even though Google Pixel 3 XL is older than the Motorola One Zoom, it's design is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a little better processing power than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a higher pixel density. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB and more internal storage.
The Motorola One Zoom features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17 percent more battery capacity. Motorola One Zoom counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 3 XL is also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.