Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL, with a score of 83.1 against 80.7. OPPO Find X2 Pro is a newer device than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a just a little inferior number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a little bit higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little better performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has faster video frame rates, a lot larger back camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs, a larger camera aperture and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with greater battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 3430mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.