Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 global score. Google Pixel 3 XL is an extremely older device than the Galaxy A15 5G, but Google managed to make it a little bit thinner and a little lighter anyway. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A15 5G has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Google Pixel 3 XL has a really superior performance than Galaxy A15 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM.
Galaxy A15 5G shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3430mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.