Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, with an 84.6 score against 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G body is newer than Google Pixel 3 XL's, but it is just a little bit heavier and thicker. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A22 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the same video frame rate and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a way more MP back-facing camera. Galaxy A22 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 46% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.