Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. The Google Pixel 3 XL is an notably older phone than the Galaxy A25 5G, but it is just a little lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. Google Pixel 3 XL has a very superior CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A25 5G has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A25 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.