Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 general score. Galaxy A51 5G is a newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 3 XL, although it is a little heavier and a bit thicker. Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A51 5G has better battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3430mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3 XL, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.