Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than Google Pixel 3 XL's general score of 80.7. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's body is newer, but a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than Google Pixel 3 XL. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel amount per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A52 5G has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3430mAh. Galaxy A52 5G has a greater camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.